Skip to content
Request a scope call
Service line B

Pipelines that run
without being watched.

Where an agent owns a job, a workflow moves work between systems. Most operations need both: the pipeline carries the volume, the agent handles the judgement, and the exception queue catches whatever neither should decide alone.

01 / WHAT WE AUTOMATE

Four kinds of
pipeline.

Each is scoped as its own workflow in Schedule A, with a named trigger, a defined path, a failure route and an owner.

Type 01

Event-driven

Something happens in one system and work flows through the others. An order lands, a ticket opens, a payment clears, a document arrives.

  • Webhook, queue or polling trigger
  • Conditional routing on your business rules
  • Retry with backoff, then a failure queue
  • Full audit trail on every step
Type 02

Scheduled

Routines that run on the clock — daily reconciliations, nightly syncs, month-cycle closes, weekly reporting packs.

  • Cron-style scheduling with timezone control
  • Idempotent runs — a re-run does not double-post
  • Missed-run detection and alerting
  • Run history with duration and record counts
Type 03

Approval chains

Work that must pass through a person before it proceeds. The pipeline prepares everything; the human decides; the pipeline finishes the job.

  • Threshold-based routing to the right approver
  • Approve, reject or amend, with reason capture
  • Escalation on age, so nothing sits forever
  • Every approval recorded against a named person
Type 04

Reconciliation & cleanup

The quiet work that keeps two systems agreeing with each other — and surfaces it loudly when they stop.

  • Match, compare and flag across systems
  • Variance thresholds you set, not defaults
  • Exception report rather than silent correction
  • Archive-and-flag — never delete
02 / GUARDS

The rules that stop
a bad run.

Automation fails badly when it fails quietly and at scale. Every workflow we build carries these controls whether or not you ask for them.

Margin and value floors

Hard numeric limits on price, discount, refund and credit. A breach is a refusal and an alert, not a warning in a log nobody reads.

Volume circuit breakers

If a workflow suddenly processes ten times the normal volume, it stops and asks. Runaway automation is caught in minutes, not at month end.

Idempotency

Re-running a job does not duplicate the work. Every write carries a key so a retry corrects rather than compounds.

Failure queue

Anything that cannot complete lands in a visible queue with the error and the payload, not in a swallowed exception.

Archive, never delete

No workflow has delete permission on a record of consequence. Removal is an archive plus a flag, reversible by a human.

Full step audit

Every step records its input, output, duration and outcome. When something goes wrong you get a trace, not a theory.

03 / TYPICAL SCOPE

How workflows are
counted and priced.

Packages include a set number of workflows — one on Pilot, five on Launch, fifteen on Operate. A workflow is one trigger and its complete path, including exception routes. Splitting a path into two branches does not make it two workflows, and we will not count it that way.

See package inclusions
Example — order exception workflow
  1. Trigger: order flagged by the marketplace as address-invalid
  2. Enrich: pull customer history and prior corrections from the CRM
  3. Agent: draft a corrected address and a customer message
  4. Guard: if order value is above the threshold, route to approval
  5. Human: approve, amend or reject — reason captured
  6. Write: update the marketplace and the ERP, both idempotent
  7. Log: full decision record with inputs, retained 24 months
  8. Fail path: any step error goes to the failure queue with the payload
Next step

Send us one process. We’ll tell you what it costs to automate it.

The discovery call is free and carries no obligation. If AI is the wrong answer for your process, we would rather say so in the first hour than in month three.

Request a scope call Call +91 99944 61072 Free discovery call · Honest feasibility view